Viewpager+Fragment动态处理(添加、删除)

问题

在进行Fragment的添加和删除时,适配器刷新之后发现并没有什么变化,这是为什么呢?

理解

FragmentPagerAdapter

适合少量的页面显示。该类每一个生成的Fragment对象都会储存在内存中,所以适合相对静态、页面少的情况,如果是页面多,且Fragment的处理相对动态(添加、删除等)时,使用FragmentStatePagerAdapter较为适合。

FragmentStatePagerAdapter

适合大量的页面显示,当页面处于不可见时,可能会被销毁,只保留该片段的保存状态。与FragmentPagerAdapter切换页面产生的大量开销对比,这允许了适配器保持与每个被访问页面相关联的更少的存储器。

分析

在切换页面时,FragmentPagerAdapter与FragmentStatePagerAdapter对于上上页(预加载默认1,所以取上上页)的处理是不相同的,FragmentPagerAdapter只是销毁对应Fragment的视图,而FragmentStatePagerAdapter则是把Fragment的实例和视图都销毁了。

当我们对页面进行动态处理时,添加(或删除)是对适配器所持有的list对象进行长度的变化,操作完之后就进行适配器的刷新,也就是notifyDataSetChanged方法,先看看该方法:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
//PagerAdapter.class
public void notifyDataSetChanged() {
synchronized (this) {
if (mViewPagerObserver != null) {
//根据源码可知mViewPagerObserver的对象是ViewPager里面PagerObserver类的实例
mViewPagerObserver.onChanged();
}
}
mObservable.notifyChanged();
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
//ViewPager.class
private class PagerObserver extends DataSetObserver {
PagerObserver() {
}

@Override
public void onChanged() {
//调用的是该方法
dataSetChanged();
}
@Override
public void onInvalidated() {
dataSetChanged();
}
}

对FragmentPagerAdapter(或FragmentStatePagerAdapter)执行的方法大概进行注释一下,方便理解,

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
//ViewPager.class
void dataSetChanged() {
// This method only gets called if our observer is attached, so mAdapter is non-null.

final int adapterCount = mAdapter.getCount();
mExpectedAdapterCount = adapterCount;
boolean needPopulate = mItems.size() < mOffscreenPageLimit * 2 + 1
&& mItems.size() < adapterCount;
int newCurrItem = mCurItem;

boolean isUpdating = false;
//遍历所有item
for (int i = 0; i < mItems.size(); i++) {
final ItemInfo ii = mItems.get(i);
//先调用adapter的getItemPosition方法,获得newPos值
final int newPos = mAdapter.getItemPosition(ii.object);

if (newPos == PagerAdapter.POSITION_UNCHANGED) {
continue;
}

if (newPos == PagerAdapter.POSITION_NONE) {
mItems.remove(i);
i--;

if (!isUpdating) {
mAdapter.startUpdate(this);
isUpdating = true;
}
//newPos值为PagerAdapter.POSITION_NONE的时候才会执行destroyItem方法
mAdapter.destroyItem(this, ii.position, ii.object);
needPopulate = true;

if (mCurItem == ii.position) {
// Keep the current item in the valid range
newCurrItem = Math.max(0, Math.min(mCurItem, adapterCount - 1));
needPopulate = true;
}
continue;
}

if (ii.position != newPos) {
if (ii.position == mCurItem) {
// Our current item changed position. Follow it.
newCurrItem = newPos;
}

ii.position = newPos;
needPopulate = true;
}
}

if (isUpdating) {
//finishUpdate方法主要是对事务的操作进行commit
mAdapter.finishUpdate(this);
}

Collections.sort(mItems, COMPARATOR);

if (needPopulate) {
// Reset our known page widths; populate will recompute them.
final int childCount = getChildCount();
for (int i = 0; i < childCount; i++) {
final View child = getChildAt(i);
final LayoutParams lp = (LayoutParams) child.getLayoutParams();
if (!lp.isDecor) {
lp.widthFactor = 0.f;
}
}
//
setCurrentItemInternal(newCurrItem, false, true);
requestLayout();
}
}

Adapter.getItemPosition方法默认返回的是PagerAdapter.POSITION_UNCHANGED值,如果我们不重写getItemPosition方法,使其返回PagerAdapter.POSITION_NONE的话,那么默认是不操作destroyItem方法的,而在destroyItem方法中,FragmentPagerAdapter和FragmentStatePagerAdapter 对Fragment对象的操作也不一样,上面有说过,FragmentPagerAdapter是只销毁视图,FragmentStatePagerAdapter 是把实例和视图都销毁,就是在destroyItem方法实现的,贴代码:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
//FragmentPagerAdapter
@Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
if (mCurTransaction == null) {
mCurTransaction = mFragmentManager.beginTransaction();
}
if (DEBUG) Log.v(TAG, "Detaching item #" + getItemId(position) + ": f=" + object
+ " v=" + ((Fragment)object).getView());
//这里是对fragment进行detach操作,fragmentManager中还保存该实例
mCurTransaction.detach((Fragment)object);
}
//FragmentStatePagerAdapter
@Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
Fragment fragment = (Fragment) object;

if (mCurTransaction == null) {
mCurTransaction = mFragmentManager.beginTransaction();
}
if (DEBUG) Log.v(TAG, "Removing item #" + position + ": f=" + object
+ " v=" + ((Fragment)object).getView());
while (mSavedState.size() <= position) {
mSavedState.add(null);
}
mSavedState.set(position, fragment.isAdded()
? mFragmentManager.saveFragmentInstanceState(fragment) : null);
mFragments.set(position, null);
//而这里是对fragment进行remove,直接在fragmentManager中移除掉
mCurTransaction.remove(fragment);
}

解决

根据上面的分析,在进行添加删除的时候,我采用了FragmentStatePagerAdapter的子类,进行方法的重写,主要是对该类的两个方法(instantiateItem和destroyItem)进行重写,替换父类的实现,代码如下:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
package com.voctex.adapter;

import android.os.Parcelable;
import android.support.v4.app.Fragment;
import android.support.v4.app.FragmentManager;
import android.support.v4.app.FragmentStatePagerAdapter;
import android.support.v4.view.PagerAdapter;
import android.view.ViewGroup;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;


public class DynamicFragmentAdapter extends FragmentStatePagerAdapter {
private FragmentManager mFragmentManager;
private List<Fragment> mFragments = new ArrayList<>();

public DynamicFragmentAdapter(FragmentManager fm, List<Fragment> list) {
super(fm);
this.mFragmentManager = fm;
if (list == null) return;
this.mFragments.addAll(list);
}

public void updateData(List<Fragment> mlist) {
if (mlist == null) return;
this.mFragments.clear();
this.mFragments.addAll(mlist);
notifyDataSetChanged();
}

@Override
public Fragment getItem(int arg0) {
return mFragments.get(arg0);//
}

@Override
public int getCount() {
return mFragments.size();//
}

@Override
public Parcelable saveState() {
return null;
}

@Override
public int getItemPosition(Object object) {
if (!((Fragment) object).isAdded() || !mFragments.contains(object)) {
return PagerAdapter.POSITION_NONE;
}
return mFragments.indexOf(object);
}

@Override
public Object instantiateItem(ViewGroup container, int position) {

Fragment instantiateItem = ((Fragment) super.instantiateItem(container, position));
Fragment item = mFragments.get(position);
if (instantiateItem == item) {
return instantiateItem;
} else {
//如果集合中对应下标的fragment和fragmentManager中的对应下标的fragment对象不一致,那么就是新添加的,所以自己add进入;这里为什么不直接调用super方法呢,因为fragment的mIndex搞的鬼,以后有机会再补一补。
mFragmentManager.beginTransaction().add(container.getId(), item).commitNowAllowingStateLoss();
return item;
}
}

@Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
Fragment fragment = (Fragment) object;
//如果getItemPosition中的值为PagerAdapter.POSITION_NONE,就执行该方法。
if (mFragments.contains(fragment)) {
super.destroyItem(container, position, fragment);
return;
}
//自己执行移除。因为mFragments在删除的时候就把某个fragment对象移除了,所以一般都得自己移除在fragmentManager中的该对象。
mFragmentManager.beginTransaction().remove(fragment).commitNowAllowingStateLoss();

}
}

结束语

在不断的看源码,查资料,调试程序中,终于是把该问题解决了,网上的资料都说得模棱两可,很多时候都得自己操刀,理解了才是自己的,特别是Fragment在FragmentManager中的mIndex值,有点坑,这里没拿出来说,以后有机会再补补。

坚持原创技术分享,您的支持将鼓励我继续创作!